Forged Alliance Forever

Re: Seraphim T2 Destroyer

2011-09-09T08:12:31+02:00

The patch is not yet available for you. Will be on next update.

Statistics: Posted by Ze_PilOt — 09 Sep 2011, 08:12

Re: Seraphim T2 Destroyer

2011-09-09T01:24:39+02:00

what faction did you try ? i will try it

but even so , it should stop torpedoes each x seconds

EDIT : i redid the test. Indeed one torp is stopped once in a while , but its still fucked up. It should stop a lot more torps than that

Statistics: Posted by -_V_- — 09 Sep 2011, 01:24

Re: Seraphim T2 Destroyer

2011-09-09T00:48:04+02:00

V, in my tests the seraphim destroyer would always stop the first torpedo fired at it, but no torpedoes afterwards unless there was an extended (6 or more seconds) pause. I believe my change fixes that.

Statistics: Posted by FunkOff — 09 Sep 2011, 00:48

Re: Seraphim T2 Destroyer

2011-09-08T22:46:44+02:00

well i reckon this is a bug since i really never saw any torps stopped by any defense from the sera destro

Statistics: Posted by -_V_- — 08 Sep 2011, 22:46

Re: Seraphim T2 Destroyer

2011-09-07T19:35:56+02:00

Fix the bugs first. If the torp defense isnt working, that is first priority.

Statistics: Posted by Treble — 07 Sep 2011, 19:35

Re: Seraphim T2 Destroyer

2011-09-07T12:14:12+02:00

i admit this sera destro maybe needs a little buff.
Maybe a range increase could resolve this problem

Statistics: Posted by Lu_Xun_17 — 07 Sep 2011, 12:14

Re: Seraphim T2 Destroyer

2011-09-07T08:47:55+02:00

If it's confirmed, Sera is really broken to the extreme

We have to fix all these kind of bugs before thinking of changing a single number for balance...

Statistics: Posted by Ze_PilOt — 07 Sep 2011, 08:47

Re: Seraphim T2 Destroyer

2011-09-07T07:04:20+02:00

yeah just tested it, submerged it's a joke, a real disaster. non submerged it's better, it can be more or less close depending how good ur micro is but you still get owned no matter what . I especially recommend the test submerged vs cyb destro . I've just made the test once again (I already did to test the navies) and 10v10, 5 cyb remain and in quite good shape

submerging is good though to avoid those t1 frigates.

EDIT : oh and btw they mostly get owned cause the anti torps aren't working from what i've seen so far

Statistics: Posted by -_V_- — 07 Sep 2011, 07:04

Re: Seraphim T2 Destroyer

2011-09-07T06:56:40+02:00

try it

I actually have a small doubt when it comes to aeon cause obviously you can dodge a lot of shots.
But those depth charges are quite effective

T2 sera suck imho and is the reason why i don't play sera on navy. Ofc t3 subs are great but i'm more interested in being polyvalent and being able to pound bases with my navy, good luck with t3 subs.

Statistics: Posted by -_V_- — 07 Sep 2011, 06:56

Re: Seraphim T2 Destroyer

2011-09-07T06:42:05+02:00

Doesnt a sera des beat the others when submerged??

Statistics: Posted by TAG_ROCK — 07 Sep 2011, 06:42

Re: Seraphim T2 Destroyer

2011-09-07T06:35:54+02:00

t2 sera destros are the weakest. any other destro will own it. same number of destros, no way you win against any other faction.
It's actually even worse when they are submerged

Statistics: Posted by -_V_- — 07 Sep 2011, 06:35

Re: Seraphim T2 Destroyer

2011-09-06T20:15:25+02:00

Actually, looking at the DB, you are correct Gowerly.

Statistics: Posted by FunkOff — 06 Sep 2011, 20:15

Re: Seraphim T2 Destroyer

2011-09-06T19:55:49+02:00

Wasn't the only nerf their speed?

Statistics: Posted by Gowerly — 06 Sep 2011, 19:55

Re: Seraphim T2 Destroyer

2011-09-06T19:51:43+02:00

Gowerly, T3 subs were nerfed considerably... but I do think we need to see how the new T3 subs play out. They aren't freewin in the seas anymore, but they are probably still good.

Statistics: Posted by FunkOff — 06 Sep 2011, 19:51

Re: Seraphim T2 Destroyer

2011-09-06T19:50:22+02:00

Sera has weaker t2 and stronger t3, though. If you make t2 the same, you run the risk of sera being able to fight at t2 and then going t3 and saying "LOL eat t3 subs"

Statistics: Posted by Gowerly — 06 Sep 2011, 19:50