3674 hp changes feedback thread

Moderators: Zock, JaggedAppliance

Re: 3674 hp changes feedback thread

Postby Viba » 13 Feb 2017, 19:42

Mad`Mozart wrote:
Viba wrote:Naval factories die too easily. Please revert HP changes, thank you.

T3 support factories die to T1 bombers.

Its not like t2 flak would stop them :)

Yes because cybran T2 flak works nicely on water :lol:
Viba
Moderator
 
Posts: 178
Joined: 22 Jan 2015, 21:42
Has liked: 90 times
Been liked: 147 times
FAF User Name: !smurfcheck Viba

Re: 3674 hp changes feedback thread

Postby PsychoBoB » 13 Feb 2017, 19:48

Viba wrote:
Mad`Mozart wrote:
Viba wrote:Naval factories die too easily. Please revert HP changes, thank you.

T3 support factories die to T1 bombers.

Its not like t2 flak would stop them :)

Yes because cybran T2 flak works nicely on water :lol:

The stationary one works well on water :geek:
PsychoBoB
Avatar-of-War
 
Posts: 266
Joined: 12 Sep 2011, 09:25
Has liked: 94 times
Been liked: 12 times
FAF User Name: McNeil

Re: 3674 hp changes feedback thread

Postby Sovietpride » 13 Feb 2017, 21:34

Cybran land HQ dying to a single TML is hilarious.
Sovietpride
Avatar-of-War
 
Posts: 225
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 17:44
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 93 times
FAF User Name: Sovietpride

Re: 3674 hp changes feedback thread

Postby Agrum » 14 Feb 2017, 21:00

Viba wrote:Naval factories die too easily. Please revert HP changes, thank you.


Sovietpride wrote:Cybran land HQ dying to a single TML is hilarious.



i played a couple of ladder games as cybran, and i can confirm this.

This patch isn't improving anything - there's nothing positive i can say about it.
For me the game is broken now, change it back !
Agrum
Crusader
 
Posts: 19
Joined: 18 Jan 2016, 20:44
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times
FAF User Name: Agrum

Re: 3674 hp changes feedback thread

Postby Morax » 14 Feb 2017, 21:48

Honestly, could you explain to use besides "faction diversity" how you actually came up with the hp changes?

Did you guys simply sandbox this or play some actual 1v1 games to trial?

I did some sandbox testing with people recently and I have to say it's extremely underwhelming to just have two "equal-mass" armies charge in at each other to determine how to balance things out; further, no one wanted to test things like a mix of t3 shield + othuum verse percies or harbs to try and make the utility units relevant.

It seems like the game is being "balanced" purely based on guess-work or very mild testing scenarios. No evidence has ever come forth showing why these hp changes are good other than "we tested it and we know better than you."

Sad...
World-Wide Peoples' Championship: Forged Alliance Forever's Infinite Tournament

1v1 WWPC Tournament Details

Open 1v1 ratings: U1100, U1500, U1900, and O1900 brackets. Click link above for details, rules, and here for maps.
User avatar
Morax
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 1781
Joined: 25 Jul 2014, 18:00
Has liked: 487 times
Been liked: 375 times
FAF User Name: Morax

Re: 3674 hp changes feedback thread

Postby PhilipJFry » 14 Feb 2017, 22:40

You can find the reason for the hp changes in the changelog.
I'd also like to point out that i was not part of the balance team before the 3674 patch got rolled out.
cats>dogs
User avatar
PhilipJFry
Avatar-of-War
 
Posts: 265
Joined: 23 Mar 2016, 21:16
Has liked: 96 times
Been liked: 86 times
FAF User Name: PhilipJFry

Re: 3674 hp changes feedback thread

Postby Ithilis_Quo » 14 Feb 2017, 22:48

I say you a story. This storry will be about guy who was in team that togetoger rush tml.

T2 on acu cost 800m tml cost another 700m whats less as cost T2 factory. When enemy is cybran he have very tuff time to defent against. Its tiny chance that he will be able to build t2 engie what he can do is only rush own T2 on acu and hope to not be tmled to face on that time. And when he do that then there is another guy, who build such a good eco...

This is problem.
"Fixed in Equilibrium" Washy
User avatar
Ithilis_Quo
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 1258
Joined: 29 Dec 2012, 15:55
Location: Slovakia
Has liked: 341 times
Been liked: 156 times
FAF User Name: Ithilis

Re: 3674 hp changes feedback thread

Postby PhilipJFry » 14 Feb 2017, 22:55

Image
Not sure what you mean last time i checked 1200 was still less than 1500.
cats>dogs
User avatar
PhilipJFry
Avatar-of-War
 
Posts: 265
Joined: 23 Mar 2016, 21:16
Has liked: 96 times
Been liked: 86 times
FAF User Name: PhilipJFry

Re: 3674 hp changes feedback thread

Postby Morax » 14 Feb 2017, 22:57

PhilipJFry wrote:You can find the reason for the hp changes in the changelog.
I'd also like to point out that i was not part of the balance team before the 3674 patch got rolled out.


Awesome, I will treat you with the same regard and say can you go read how people don't like it and change it?

I've read the changelog and want to know the actual methodology and directive that led to that, not some public statement.
World-Wide Peoples' Championship: Forged Alliance Forever's Infinite Tournament

1v1 WWPC Tournament Details

Open 1v1 ratings: U1100, U1500, U1900, and O1900 brackets. Click link above for details, rules, and here for maps.
User avatar
Morax
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 1781
Joined: 25 Jul 2014, 18:00
Has liked: 487 times
Been liked: 375 times
FAF User Name: Morax

Re: 3674 hp changes feedback thread

Postby Mad`Mozart » 14 Feb 2017, 23:03

I played a bunch of 1v1 games with current balance now, and i cant say that i found hp changes grossly imbalanced like some certain people here are whining about. They seem to work quite nice for me instead. I like its easier to raid mexes now, especially with t1 bombers that are getting more useful now compared to what it was in last patch with their nerf and t1 maa buff.

Have yet to play a game where cyb t2 HQ gets tml sniped, but i've been avoiding land maps since last patch and gonna continue doing so :) Cant say that i favor that change on paper tho.
Mad`Mozart
Evaluator
 
Posts: 886
Joined: 10 Mar 2013, 19:09
Has liked: 108 times
Been liked: 323 times

PreviousNext

Return to Balance Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests