T2 "tanks" needs rebalance

[ColonelSheppard]

yes, but it cant hover, like i said, you cannot compare it

[Golol]

yes and you pay for that feature.
the aeons only counter t1 unit is the hover tank what is bad, because the hover tank will barely bee as good as a usal unit because you have to pay for the hovering.
the amphibian tanks of the races should be for sudden naval attacks, easy crossing or assissting your fleet. not the needed unit for land war.
i think that makes tech a bad option for an aeon and he should go spam
but the aurora is bad for spam and because they have such a strong cpunter t2 unit they feel like they should be dedicated to tech.

[ColonelSheppard]

yes and you pay for that feature.
the aeons only counter t1 unit is the hover tank what is bad, because the hover tank will barely bee as good as a usal unit because you have to pay for the hovering.
the amphibian tanks of the races should be for sudden naval attacks, easy crossing or assissting your fleet. not the needed unit for land war.
i think that makes tech a bad option for an aeon and he should go spam
but the aurora is bad for spam and because they have such a strong cpunter t2 unit they feel like they should be dedicated to tech.

ahm, yeah no

[Golol]

come on, tell me whats wrong.
mabye i see it and agree on you.

[Sunny]

There is also an important moment.

All my math in the beggining was done in assumption of perfect focused from both sides and doesn't take overkill into account (for the reason of keeping things simple).

Say tests show that Pillars win vs unmicroed Wagners, but my math says Wagners have slight edge focused.
Mb overkill will eat the edge up, mb wagners will win with like 1 or 2 left for 2000 mass.

But I assume, that if you even build T3 units in current state of things, you don't spam them, but use in limited quantities for whatever strategic goals before the transition to totally dominating T3. This makes the assumption of perfect focused fire strong.