Iszh wrote:Atm i will sign up here:
BUT i have to admit two things here:
1.) Ammount of games is even more than IGC with 3 1v1 games and it is a lot of work to organize this over working week
2.) especially with not to be allwed to change more than 50% of my team. In IGC rooster was made at the tourney day when all people collected and that was always difficult.
Maybe your idea to play the 1v1 games and 2v2 games flexible over the week is good, no idea it feels difficult for me to organize.
Thanks for your concern, but the freetime issue won't be a large issue for me. I'm a college kid who has gained quite a bit of freetime recently so this is just one way I can fill up my schedule.
The logic with the additional 1v1s revolve around the idea that if your clan can't get 3 people online during the span of a week for their 1v1 matches, then they more than likely aren't going to be able to get 4 people online at a specified time for a 4v4 either. While it is more 1v1s, the games are not BO3 so all a person needs to spare during their week is 30 minutes at max for their game.
My tournament philosophy is based around the concept of flexibility because I am not completely sure what the clan activity on FAF is currently. I do not want rigid schedules or anything like that because I find that tends to add an additional issue for clans to overcome in order to participate (not only having the members but also having the members that can play at a specified time). I had conversations with several people more experienced with tournaments than me and I sacrificed some flexibility in order to prevent abuses in the tournament, however. The 50% rule for the roster is part of that. There is no point in making a roster if the entire team can just be changed, and I would hate to have a roster of 1300s suddenly turn into a roster of 2000s from some of the larger clans.