Geosearchef wrote:@tatsu Why do you use wine to run steam? Just download ForgedAlliance using the normal steam installation. Either using steamplay or by tricking the linux client into downloading it nonetheless(see manual section here:
https://github.com/dotfloat/steam-appmanifest#manual).
FA downloads and installs and runs just dandy via native steam.
that's what I'm talking about when I say "proton-steam" us in this thread have been experimenting with that... trying to find a way to run FA with a proton command line
but our efforts are foiled by, it seems, a will from steam to prevent specifically this.
If you have managed to do this or have any info that could help, I'm
dying for that exactly.
(if you want I can point you to online evidence of my quest)
Geosearchef wrote:That's not so much about finding time but more about missing library compatability. Trust me, we are more annoyed by the new java release cycle than you are
. (Java 12 coming up in 4 months)
I would imagine so.
I work in enterprise dev as a frontend (Angular, React, Vue, you name it) and in the REST/SOAP setup where I'm a front dev doing 100% front code and I collaborate with backends who do the back code, more then 70% of the time ..in java.
So I get a lot of flack from the java backends (that I receive in kind, don't worry, it's all play) about how the Javascript world is a wirlwind/tornado, what have you, basically a mess.
I really enjoyed this tongue-in-cheek moment where I got to ask them how it was that their "oh so perfect" java now had a release who's name must not be spoken.
Geosearchef wrote:can someone give me a list of issues that still remain on linux with the java client using the _dfc_unix_0_9_2-beta.tar.gz release?
EDIT : these were moved to github issues, almost all of the are resolved.
these are the ones that remain :
https://github.com/FAForever/downlords- ... ssues/1099https://github.com/FAForever/downlords- ... ssues/1098https://github.com/FAForever/downlords- ... ssues/1097Geosearchef wrote:Should we publish an additional .deb file or is the .tar.gz release fine for you? (I think the deb currently still has some permission issues aswell)
well linux users have moved on from the days of compiling software they just want to run and have on their computer
so the tar.gz thing is awkward by today's linuxer's comfort standards I'd say but really not that bad.
the .deb permission issues were pretty blatant and obnoxious so I'd say shy away from that. I'll look into how .runs are made since that's what's ubuntu and the gang are moving towards.
but anyways, if the permissions thing can be fixed (and it installs to home instead) then .deb is the way to go.