EvanGalea wrote:I guess this is a good place to ask the question: What happens if there's a huge conflict between ladder team and playerbase opinion? Like say the ladder team think a map is really good but the majority of voters hate it? does it kinda cancel out and the map shows up an average amount of times?
Vote tally doesn't directly influence the score
edit: "yet" as far as we are concerned, a conflict will however force a reevaluation of said score amongst the team (who are just as happy to argue about maps as anyone else) we haven't had a major issue yet, but i would assume team members would attempt to find out why by asking around if there was one and we didn't understand the problem.
Also, what happens if a new version of a bad map is uploaded, but before the new version, it was panned so heavily it's set to almost never appears? Is the map given a second chance in another vote or pool?
Never thought about that, and that should be "my area" Yikes.
I
will know if a new version is uploaded, however if a mapper has decided there is a major change they should let us know directly through any channel. Map scores can be reevaluated at any time and are constantly adjusted. If I were to adjust a score mere seconds before someone generated a pool, the changes would apply.
To be fair, I only know of two maps rated too poorly to be considered. Let's just say that we try to avoid cluttering the spreadsheet if the time investment was less on the map then it was on said sheet. You get me?
overwatch
Not only is only balancing around the pro scene just not true, why is this even here?
Are you trying to confer a point about considering low rated opinions on maps? We do already attempt that.
having FtX on the team makes it easy kappa