biass wrote:
Here is some responses
I meant here that you require a large following of people who trust and agree with your voice. A midlevel reviewer will not grant a large amount of trust as would a professional/popular one, and that's even more challenging when people find out you're a few dollars away from basically shilling.
Would love to see the study, because i disagree, typically with presentation you have only a few milliseconds to grab the viewers attention and my window personally is even less, and with youtube's way of showing ads in the video that draws attention to the video title/description/comments, it seems like an unnecessary addition of information
I mentioned them before but i would reference samandniko to see how they use their intro card, its after some intro sequence that already has your attention, and only lasts for a second, later iterations play on the card (put it upside down, etc) as people already know what they're watching.
Seen it, its got some strange shots in the video and some strange colour manipulation as well, with the best shot being the GC death, i would make sure your ingame maps are well lit (
) and follow some basic rule of thirds, don't overdo the vibrance
glad to see you can take feedback like an adult, its rare around here.
Here is some responses
3: I'm not doing it for the subscriber. I'm doing it to get more awareness out there. So once I upload it, if people want my video and upload it for themselves to increase viewership, I'm more than okay with that. I'm not a youtuber, I stream just to increase youtube exposure of the game. But, I want the game to become more popular. So I'm helping when I can spare the time.
I meant here that you require a large following of people who trust and agree with your voice. A midlevel reviewer will not grant a large amount of trust as would a professional/popular one, and that's even more challenging when people find out you're a few dollars away from basically shilling.
4: Now the intro. I couldn't agree with you more. It's something I rendered just to have something in the start. Case studies show that videos with logo intros similar to that have a higher view rate and viewer attention (more of the video is watched). So I'm trying to abide by the scientific approach where I can. But yes, I will be changing that cringe shit
Would love to see the study, because i disagree, typically with presentation you have only a few milliseconds to grab the viewers attention and my window personally is even less, and with youtube's way of showing ads in the video that draws attention to the video title/description/comments, it seems like an unnecessary addition of information
I mentioned them before but i would reference samandniko to see how they use their intro card, its after some intro sequence that already has your attention, and only lasts for a second, later iterations play on the card (put it upside down, etc) as people already know what they're watching.
5: Angles and contrast. I'm no video editor, nor a color expert. But, I'm trying to simulate something similar to Gyle's Megalith video (here's the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9jGeqc2Cpg). I remember them messing with some color adjustments in the low light and high light. Seems like there was some bloom work as well.
Seen it, its got some strange shots in the video and some strange colour manipulation as well, with the best shot being the GC death, i would make sure your ingame maps are well lit (
) and follow some basic rule of thirds, don't overdo the vibranceglad to see you can take feedback like an adult, its rare around here.
Well, I'm treating it like an adult because I am. Lol but going through my masters in public health has taught me the value of proper research and implementation. It can really mean the difference between successful odoption and a waste of gov funding. I want this done right, and getting it right means listening to everyone.
What sucks is the research I'm reading varies in results depending on their sample age. I'm targeting a wide age range, so using strategies that work is a bit difficult, but I am using what overlap I can identify. I'm trying to appeal to 15 yr up (there's simply more overlaping psychology after that age).
As for my YouTube size and the perceived viewer trust you mentioned. Good God, I couldn't agree more. That's a hurdle I have yet to figure out. Perhaps give the video to someone with more subs, collaboration, IDK. I'm a sponge in this area, so suggestions are welcomed. I'm trying to make a video that is on par with high quality high subscriber count. My thought is (based on what I've read from reported YouTube's algorithm, all of which is speculation because they haven't released details on that obviously), if it picks up steam (meaning, high viewership that is abnormal for my average). For example: say the video gets viewed by 1000 views. This would be abnormal momentum, and could be added to recommended lists for people of similar YouTube habits (showing historic interest in gaming, RTS ect). Say of those 1000 people, 20% seek out faf. I'm okay with 200 people coming to faf. The point is to just bring more people. I have no plans of really stopping there either. But again, I'm open to suggestions.
I'm probably going to give the video to someone with more subs (heaven or something). I want to do this to spread the word about faf. I couldn't care less about my YouTube channel. I started it in the hopes to increase faf's footnote.
I'm more than aware of the limitations I face, that's why I have some ideas of how to diffuse these videos outside of the main faf community. Because let's face it, people who are subscribed to faf videos are niche in nature. I have a plan to diffuse it, but I am open to suggestions.
Boy that was long winded. Wrote this on my phone, so it's a bit disorganized, sorry about that. Thanks for the feedback bias. If you have anything else for me, I'm all ears.
Statistics: Posted by Medicraze — 07 Oct 2017, 17:18
]]>
fonts.google.com
